Doug Williams:

Doug Williams is the founder of Doug Williams and Associates (DWA). A results oriented business consultant Doug is experienced in designing and implementing strategic plans and business systems.
Read More...


I am creating new webinars based on the topics in this blog.
These webinars will all be presented by myself, Doug Williams. To be notified of these upcoming webinars, please sign-up below!
Name:
Email:
Your email address will never be sold or given to any 3rd party.

Books by Doug:

Mastering Blog Marketing Book
Website Marketing Mastery Book
Biz Blog Marketing Book

Related Websites:

Clean Code Does Help Bing Website Rankings!

Filed under: SEO Strategies — Doug Williams @ 4:18 am

This blog entry was posted on October 6, 2009.

Clean code doesn’t seem to affect Google search rankings… but what about Bing? I decided to apply the same analysis I did with Google onto Bing search results. (See W3Cvalidation does not help website rankings ).

I took the same 14 keyword phrases. I decided to compare top ranked websites (ranked 1-5) against lower ranked sites (ranked 101-105) and also against even lower ranked web pages (ranked 201-205). Bing was used as the search engine.

I ran every web page that appeared in the Bing search results through the W3C validator and tabulated the results.

Results:

  1. 210 web pages were checked for errors (14 phrases x 15 positions each).
  2. 26,040 total errors were detected using the W3C validator.
  3. 124 errors per page average was found. This ranged from 0 errors (valid code) to 1235 errors Position 203 for the phrase “garden designer programs.”
  4. 7.14% were valid code: 15 pages were found to be valid code (7.14%). This is much higher than the Opera study of 3.5 million pages that found 4.13% of all pages checked to be valid. Compare this with my prior Google analysis which showed 4.28% for these same phrases. This indicates Bing prefers valid code.
  5. 21.4% fewer errors in first 5 positions: Positions 1-5 had 98 errors per page which is 21.3% fewer errors than the average for all pages. Positions 201-205 had the highest number of errors per page at 153.  There is a consistent correlation to errors and rankings on Bing. See the details below.
  6. Bing and Google return different search results. 43% of the time the number 1 listing would match between the search engines (6 out of 14 keyword phrases).  Only 2 of 5 results would be found somewhere in the first 5 positions (not in the same order).

Conclusion: Clean code (or at least cleaner code) seems to make a difference with Bing. It seemed to have no effect on Google rankings. Other SEO  factors are also at work, but there were a significant correlation between clean code and better results. Bing also showed many more valid coded pages than we found in the Google analysis.

Oct 4, 2009

Average code errors per page

Search Positions>>

1-5

101-105

201-205

amusement parks

22

56

242

business cards

326

162

54

Business Consulting

69

33

14

consulting firms

29

38

108

email marketing

92

55

121

garden designer programs

72

147

293

home for sale in california

121

516

330

homes for sale

77

299

347

internet marketing

77

60

239

loan modification

57

50

39

natural supplements

162

89

147

online marketing

124

67

128

website design

55

60

3

used paper equipment

83

62

83

Averages

98

121

153

Socially Bookmark Us:
  • Digg
  • StumbleUpon
  • Facebook
  • del.icio.us
  • Twitter
  • FriendFeed
  • Propeller
  • Sphinn
  • Reddit
  • RSS
  • Technorati
  • Google Bookmarks

Related posts:

  1. W3C Validation Does Not Help Website Rankings!
  2. Website Coding Will Affect Your Search Rankings
  3. 7 Website Problems that Hurt SEO Rankings
  4. How to Keep Google Rankings When Switching Domains
  5. What is a Search Engine Friendly Website?

No Comments »

No comments yet.

RSS feed for comments on this post. TrackBack URL

Leave a comment